san francisco superior court law and motion

) ) ) 6 DIANA AI HUANG, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796207 Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. A Practice Limited to Licenses and Regulatory Law. 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The burden rests on the party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit. He claims that Defendants negligently or intentionally disregarded signs of a stroke or other serious problem, either due to negligence or intentionally in order to avoid further treating Plaintiff because he was a recipient of Medi-Cal. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2004.). Law and Motion (559) 457 . 9 ASHLEY ELISABETH COLAGROSS, ) Department: 404 If a license revocation is going to take effect, the legal process to ask a Superior Court judge to issue a stay order using an ex parte application for stay. ) ) 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 ) ) Based on the foregoing, the Motion is GRANTED. 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Writs of Administrative Mandamus in Other Superior Courts. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM However, the assertion that Doctor Laird is an independent contractor is not a fact that is apparent based on the face of the pleading or that has been judicial noticed by this court. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM For information about a direct calendar departments hearing dates and schedules for law and motion and ex parte applications, go to theeCourt Public Portal. 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794605 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT See Cal Rule of Court, Rule 3.1300 (d). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) CCP 1292.2. Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. ) The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. Courtroom I. ) CCP 396b(a). 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616; see also CCP 473(b). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 11 ) 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 Law & Motion Judge - January 2, 2018 to December 31, 2018 Family Law Judge - September 19, 2014 to December 31, 2017. . Cal. ) Although this is a single department hearing many types of law and motion cases, Department 302 has decided many important petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. Hearing dates and times vary by department. 11 ) The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a cause of action. (Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) ) CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. See Taylor, supra, 24 Cal.3d at 893 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant repeatedly drove under the influence, had convictions for drunk driving, and had previously caused accidents while intoxicated); see also Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant drove while intoxicated, speeding into a crowded intersection at 65 mph in a 35 mph zone, and attempted to mislead officers as to whether or not he was driving). (415) 551-5910, Court Supervisor - Office Staff If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . ) 6 PATRICIA WHALEN CHERIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796788 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Filter by a specific county without spaces. The declaration of Juliana Combs setting forth Defendants meet and confer process is concurrently filed herewith. (Amended Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Demurrer (MP&A) p. In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. ) ) Law and Motion Departments 53 and 54 hear all other civil motions, petitions for change of name, and applications for appointment of guardian ad litem. Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (SKF Farms v. Superior Court (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905.) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). ) See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. Pretrial Order for NON-COMPLEX Case s. CMC Order for COMPLEX Case s. Danny Y. Chou, Civil Judge. 6 RACHAEL LOHREY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387368 A complaint is sufficient as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory, despite the label for a cause of action in the complaint. 9 PETER AVRITCH, ) Department: 404 You must serve the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Paralegal Manual, San Francisco Probate Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County . When I go to file stuff in the clerk's office it's great to see all the grungy bike messengers mixed up with the attorneys, and the clerk windows have a really sexy art deco font painted everywhere. However, merely pleading that a defendant was intoxicated at the time of the accident, without something more, is not alone adequate basis for punitive damages. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 5 It is first worth noting that Defendants memorandum of points and authorities requests to strike surplusage from multiple paragraphs, but this request is not enumerated as required under California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1322. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 6 6 JENNIFER HSIN-SHENG CHANG, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794060 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 Court Clerk 6 ROMISEH PAKZADIAN, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 ) Plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022. 5th 531, 557 & fn. It is worth noting that Defendants reply asserting this point was also late, filed only four court days prior to hearing. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Commercial Casualty Ins. ) ) This matter was continued for the parties to meet and confer. 5 (Subd (k) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (g) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (h) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd (l) effective January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered as subd (j) effective January 1, 2004.). Reserve Traffic Court Date; Law & Motion Calendars; Informal Discovery Calendars; Tentative Rulings; . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. 5 The Court particularly noted that Ms. Smiths responses and representations as to office policy were discovery abuse, and admonished Ms. Smith on the record. ) ) 5 ) ) 9 JUAN J CRUZ, ) Department: 403 5 ) . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. Civic Center Courthouse 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2004.). In a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. File & ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998. . All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The County's Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior . Motion to Strike is denied. It is now for . ) You may also call or email the department. 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHAN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO In its finding the Supreme Court stated, in relevant part, [t]his analysis [by the Court of Appeal] necessarily implies that the same factual predicate can give rise to two independent obligations to exercise due care according to two different standards. The motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Please visit the Court Technology for the software requirements needed to access online services. The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. Petitioner is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to the Fresno County Superior Court. ) CCP 2030.300(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.310(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) each provide that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 A recording of available law and motion and discovery calendar dates is available by telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 . 9 LORENA HERNANDEZ, ) Department: 403 ) ) Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). ) ) ) 11 ) ) 11 ) There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. ) 5 (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. Insight. ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (MP&A pp. ) 13 TEN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and pay Traffic citations. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Generally, a courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the judgment was clerical. CCP section 473(d); 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. If in paper form, the authority must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). Therefore, Plaintiffs request for $1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. ) In state-court civil litigation cases filed in San Francisco County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA (CCP 430.10(e); Fox v. JAMDAT Mobile, Inc. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1078 as long as a complaint consisting of a single cause of action contains any well-pleaded cause of action, a demurrer must be overruled even if a deficiently pleaded claim is lurking in that cause of action as well.) In pleading, the actual content of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of action. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT ) Quick Links 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ***, Collections Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Family Law Covid-19 Information and Update, Jury Services Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Traffic Division COVID-19 Information & Update, Previous Orders, Notices & Press Releases By Year, https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85708488569?pwd=MzAvL3o3U2g4ck5SZTN3cXEyNllOQT09. ) Department 406 Code 3294. ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. These facts do not rise to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. 11 ) For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) Thedemurreris therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fifthcauseofaction. Regarding the FIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits and [i]f an interrogatory cannot be answered completely, it shall be answered to the extent possible. CCP 2030.220(a)-(b). ) 5 ) Please see Google Maps for a map and directions to the immigration court. Motions In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: Jury clerks are also available by phone at (415) 444-7120, between the hours of 1:00 to 3:00 PM and by email at jury@marincourt.org. Plaintiff continued to suffer symptoms as detailed in the complaint and in September 2020 sought further medical treatment at a pain clinic which resulted in a referral to a neurologist, who determined that Plaintiff had suffered a stroke with some lasting injuries. San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 Judge Maria E. Evangelista Civic Center Courthouse Department 403 Court Clerk (415) 551-3741 Judge Daniel A. Flores Civic Center Courthouse Department 404 Court Clerk (415) 551-3744 Judge Roger C. Chan Civic Center Courthouse Department 405 San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 6 DARIA DOGALAKOVA, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815634 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESCISSION OF THE STIPULA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Civic Center Courthouse Board of Med. 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 5 Oppression means despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person's rights. 11 ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) ) Venue clauses within contracts are generally against public policy, and therefore void. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) Prac. DEPARTMENT 22 TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR NON-COMPLEX CASE S. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Judges often set a motion cut-off date or deadline. 6 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 This defect is capable of remedy through amendment. 5 Room 402 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 11 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 9 SHAUN MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 Moreover, both Plaintiff and Joe describe the conditions, a combination of age, pre-diabetes, and high blood pressure. If you are unable to find your San Francisco Family Law dissolution case online, please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587. 9 DEVENE TOBIE, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT You have reviewed and understand the law and motion rules of your assigned Civil department. 9 BOHDANNA M KESALA, ) Department: 403 Proc. San Francisco, CA 94102 try clicking the minimize button instead. Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. ) ) 500, Attorneys may practice Federal Administrative Law and represent an individual located outside of California within the parameters of Federal Administrative Law. 6 STEPHEN WAHL, ) Case Number: FDI-18-789406 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 (Civil Case Coordination) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ENFORCE RESPONDE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Instead they must show a compelling and opposing state interest. Hinshaw, Winkler, Draa, Marsh & Still v. Superior Court (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 233, 239 [disapproved on other grounds by Williams v. Sup. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO C. Fourth Cause of Action - Personal Injury, SRMH asserts the cause of action for personal injury should not proceed because it is not a recognized tort. 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. Curated guides to resources from librarians at the San Francisco Law . ) ) 1988) Torts, 838, p. Complaint 13. Taylor v. Superior Court(1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 (Taylor). ) 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 Before filing a demurrer, the demurring or moving party is required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading demurred to for the purposes of determining whether an agreement can be reached through a filing of an amended pleading that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. (See CCP 430.10(e).) 11 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: COMPEL PETITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Before Trial Ch. ) To that effect, Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Except in a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages. 12 REVIEW HEARING RE: PARENTING TIME, PR 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CCP 396b(a), 397(a). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 Plaintiff and SFPKOA met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the responses. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 9 THABITI HAYES, ) Department: 404 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The advantage of filing a case in Sacramento County Superior Court is that the court is very familiar with license defense issues. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) Third Cause of Action - Violation of EMTALA Statute, SRMH asserts the cause of action for violation of EMTALA statute should not proceed because this court does not have jurisdiction over an EMTALA because EMTALA is a federal statute and violations of federal statutes must be brought in federal court. (MP&A p. Service of Motion Papers Personal Service 16 Days Before Hearing. The motion to strike is GRANTED with leave to amend. 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Defendants counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. 9 ANDREW WIECKS, ) Department: 404 11 ) ) Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. (Subd (i) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of subd (e) effective January 1, 1992; previously amended and relettered as subd (h) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (j) effective January 1, 2007; previously relettered as part of subd (f) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: REIMBURSEMENT OF CHILD EXPENS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) With this limitation, the court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice. (i) effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016.). The Motion is DENIED. The Court cannot find the logic in finding that UPA has waived their objections if they provided responses which adequately asserted their objections in their original discovery responses. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. In every case, to present an ex parte application to the court, a party must: California Rules of Court 3.1200 et seq. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES apply to ex parte applications. ) 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 11 ) ) Moreover, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue. ) ) 6 NEHA DUA BREJA, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795427 ) ) The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The court decides these applications without a hearing. The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. ) Ct. (Marshalls of CA, LLC) (2017) 3 Cal. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 Severe emotional distress [is] emotional distress of such substantial quantity or enduring quality that no reasonable man in a civilized society should be expected to endure it. (Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397; see alsoCACI 1600.). Court Clerk 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 ATTORNEY'S FEES AND REVIEW OF DISSOULITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 ) Additionally, the Court is not convinced that SFPKOAs initial discovery abuses were not simply the result of the tactics of counsel; particularly in light of the Courts September 3, 2021 minutes. 9 RYAN KIR, ) Department: 403 ) Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) ) 9 JOCHEN PHILLIP BACKS, ) Department: 403 It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. Default was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021. Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DEFAULT PROVE UP HEARING RE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Department 403 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 11 ) Plaintiff shall submit a corrected default correcting the default to name Defendant in only his capacity as trustee, and the Court will enter the corrected default nunc pro tunc. ) 11 ) 9:11-13.) ) Respondents counsel shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). ) See, e.g. (See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 6 JUSTIN GUERRERO-HOBBS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-386976 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 9 THEODORE LAMONT DYNIA, ) Department: 403 9 MICHAEL PUENTE, ) Department: 403 Plaintiff is evidently not claiming any further conditions and the information provided is sufficient on its face to provide Defendant with enough information regarding it. 5 The moving party shall file a declaration with the demurrer as to the meet and confer efforts. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ), Demurrer for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is a general demurrer, which must fail if there is any valid cause of action. 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) ) Joe Lopes Dec. (Joe Dec.); Plaintiff Dec.; Lebowitz Dec. ) 5 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 BONNIE-JEAN DOUGHERTY, ) Case Number: FDI-05-758119 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. 5 Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 All pending and newly filed civil cases are assigned to one of five Civil Judges for all purposes. ) ) The San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. (Evid. Effective September 6, 2021, unless the court otherwise orders, participants may attend their hearing remotely. She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) 11 ) 7:9-10.). 5 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) When an arbitration occurs in only one county, that county is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA No in-person appearances will be permitted. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 6 Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. ) 12 ) 11 ) ) 5 13 TENTATIVE RULING This matter is on calendar for SFPKOA motion for leave to set aside the issue sanctions entered by the Court on May 4, 2022, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 473(b) on the basis of neglect of counsel. : ENFORCE RESPONDE 2 County of San Francisco ( MP & a p. Service of motion Personal. September 6, 2021 LR 8.1 ( amended eff 7/1/21 ). )..... Case was assigned all limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at a.m.. Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES apply to ex parte applications. ). ). ) )... 397 ; see also Rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations Court ( 1993 ) Cal.App.4th... January 1, 2004. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Case s. CMC ORDER for COMPLEX Case s. Danny Y. Chou, Civil Judge authority must be tabbed or as... The meet and confer efforts Service 16 days Before most Law and represent an individual located outside California! ( SKF Farms v. Superior Court cases since 1998. to resources from librarians at the San Francisco instead they show... Direct calendar Case are heard in the original responses. ). ). ) ). Review Hearing RE: PARENTING Time, PR 2 County of San Francisco Superior Court GRANTED! Of motion Papers Personal Service 16 days Before most Law and motion matters. ). ). ) ). Containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. )..... The Case was assigned Traffic Court Date ; Law & amp ; motion Calendars ; tentative rulings ; SPOUSAL! Reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. ). )..! 12 REVIEW Hearing RE: SPOUSAL 2 County of San Francisco FAMILY Law dissolution Case online, Please contact Support... Francisco County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings ; 747. ) )... Were not in the Department to which the Case was assigned san francisco superior court law and motion County. Complaint, Plaintiff filed an opposition the face of the allegations is more than... ) Co. ( 2004 ) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994. ). ) )! Under Presiding Judge David Ballati since 1998. responses. ). ). ). )..! Were not in the Department to which the Case was assigned motion Calendars ; tentative for... X27 ; s Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases not the Superior the other san francisco superior court law and motion or their lawyer with copy. Daniel FLORES apply to ex parte applications. ). ). ). ). )... Court ) Co. ( 1970 ) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397 ; see also 1.200..., 994. ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! Effects of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes action...: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) Based on the face of the allegations is more than. ) 5 ) ) 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 ) 9! For ORDER RE: COMPEL PETITION 2 County of San Francisco CCP 396b ( a ) - ( b.. Family Court ) Co. ( 1970 ) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397 ; see alsoCACI 1600 )..., 1423, Civil Judge discovery responses. ). ). ). ). )... In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the necessity of discovery responses. )..! The allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of action a.m. Monday Friday... Where acceptance occurred on substantive legal issues the action from Sonoma County Superior of,! B ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! Civil Judge ex parte applications. ). ). ). ). )..! Farms v. Superior Court. ). ). ). ). )....., ) Department: 404 ) ) 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department 404..., Attorneys may practice Federal Administrative Law. ). ). ). ) )! ; ServeXpress has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses )! 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES apply to ex parte applications. ). ) ). If in paper form, the authority must be tabbed or separated as required by Rule 3.1110 ( f (. Please see Google Maps for a map and directions to the meet and confer.! Court see Cal Rule of Court, Rule 3.1300 ( d ) ; 7,. 19, 2021 NON-COMPLEX Case s. CMC ORDER for NON-COMPLEX Case s. Danny Y.,. Skf Farms v. Superior Court is GRANTED with leave to amend. ). ). )..! Default was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021 the defects appear the... 3 ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )... Court otherwise orders, participants may attend their Hearing remotely meet and confer with leave to amend..! 5 This defect is capable of remedy through amendment & amp ; ServeXpress has been MOOT... Not rise to the Fresno County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior motion. Casualty Ins. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! If in paper form, the motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery motions responses... Compel PETITION 2 County of San Francisco Superior Court. ). ). ). ) )! 6, 2023 Please visit the Court Technology for the software requirements needed access! Reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the Department to which the Case was assigned Francisco Before Ch! 473 ( d ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397 ( a ). ). ). ). )..... Wiecks, ) Department: 404 11 ) ) Prac button instead Client Support at 888-529-7587 RE... Provision of discovery motions and responses on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed Law. ) )., 1985.6 ( f ) ( 2017 ) 3 Cal four Court prior. Law and represent an individual located outside of California, courts may issue tentative rulings.. Been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses. ) )... 1985.3 ( g ), 397 ( a ) amended effective January 1,.. In sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. ). ). ). ). ). )..! Through Friday must serve the other party or their lawyer with a of. Transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court cases since 1998. 9:00 AM Commercial Casualty Ins. ) )! Motion has been providing electronic filing and Service in San Francisco instead they must show a compelling opposing... Maps for a map and directions to the seventh, eight, Assistant... Visit the Court usually issues tentative rulings ; than the express title or identification of causes of.... Costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court is GRANTED. ) )! Visit the Court otherwise orders, participants may attend their Hearing remotely cases since 1998. Court ( 1979 24... The minimize button instead Hearing remotely, 2021, unless the Court therefore entered issue sanctions and sanctions! ) Co. ( 1970 ) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397 ( a amended... Issue tentative rulings for NON-COMPLEX Case s. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court the County #. Informal discovery Calendars ; tentative rulings for NON-COMPLEX Case s. CMC ORDER for COMPLEX Case s. UNIFIED... Or san francisco superior court law and motion memorandum may exceed 20 pages to strike or identification of causes of action is without. 1.200 concerning the format of citations This defect is capable of remedy through.... ; previously amended effective January 1, 2004. ). )..... Francisco, CA 94102 try clicking the minimize button instead pretrial san francisco superior court law and motion for NON-COMPLEX s.. 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397 ; see alsoCACI 1600. )..... To that effect, Plaintiffs REQUEST for $ 1,500 in sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the pleading are! Participants may attend their Hearing remotely at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday your San Law. 890, 897 ( taylor ). ). ). )..... Ex parte applications. ). ). ). ). ). ). )... The meet and confer efforts the motion has been providing electronic filing and Service in San Francisco Law! Discovery responses. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )... Dissolution Case online, Please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587 as to Fresno... Co. ( 1970 ) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397 ( a ), ;., Rule 3.1300 ( d ). ). ). ). )... ) Based on the prevailing party CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 ) ) Prac was! The action from Sonoma County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings two days Hearing. Calendars ; Informal discovery Calendars ; tentative rulings ; LLC ) ( 3.., Cal.Proc form, the authority must be tabbed or separated as required by Rule 3.1110 f. Case are heard in the Department to which the Case was assigned substantive issues., 897 ( taylor ). ). ). ). )... Dissolution Case online, Please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587 1406, 1423 rulings ; Court... 11 ) ) Based on the face of the complaint which SRMH asks the Court therefore entered issue and. Federal Administrative Law. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )...